Kit #304 PC-6 Porter
-
paul
- Posts: 108
- Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2012 5:29 am
- Location: Cleveland UK
Re: Kit #304 PC-6 Porter
Hi David..
I am building a Piper Cherokee and restoring a Piper at the same time, and would like to try infill on this plane
Question is:
How do You measure the balsa to fit into required space?
Paul
I am building a Piper Cherokee and restoring a Piper at the same time, and would like to try infill on this plane
Question is:
How do You measure the balsa to fit into required space?
Paul
-
birdbuster
- Posts: 21
- Joined: Fri Nov 30, 2012 11:57 am
Re: Kit #304 PC-6 Porter
I'm building a F-16,and I was wondering if you put the wings and stabilizers on at a certain point.Like putting them on when you're done with the infill and spackle , or some other time.
bb
bb
-
kittyfritters
- Posts: 732
- Joined: Tue Jan 03, 2006 6:58 pm
- Location: California
Re: Kit #304 PC-6 Porter
David is a exceptional craftsman. His chosen area is static models. Here is a photo of a Porter done by another exceptional craftsman, Don Butman. His choice is flying models. He brought this Porter to the meeting before an O.F.F.C. contest, this morning, where I took the picture. Then he proceeded to take first place in the contest (NoCal Pusher), with his Lidberg Hansa Jet to my second place with my own design F7U Cutlass, by 0.8 seconds...grumble.

The Porter is covered with Microlite, and is rubber powered. He made the 3-bladed prop from two standard (black) Guillow's props. The wheels are not the kit wheels.

The Porter is covered with Microlite, and is rubber powered. He made the 3-bladed prop from two standard (black) Guillow's props. The wheels are not the kit wheels.
-
The Cameraman
- Posts: 45
- Joined: Fri Apr 06, 2012 7:10 am
- Location: Lancashire, England
Re: Kit #304 PC-6 Porter
All I can say is that is one stunning model, irrespective of the construction type.
Beautiful.
Regards
Reggie
Beautiful.
Regards
Reggie
Regards
Reggie
Reggie
-
paul
- Posts: 108
- Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2012 5:29 am
- Location: Cleveland UK
Re: Kit #304 PC-6 Porter
Hi David
Thankyou for the advice on infill, I will certainly give it a go.
5 Cents on its way, sorry I mean 3.5 Pence
Paul
Thankyou for the advice on infill, I will certainly give it a go.
5 Cents on its way, sorry I mean 3.5 Pence
Paul
-
solumn_eagle
- Posts: 20
- Joined: Wed Nov 28, 2012 6:14 pm
- Location: Atlanta GA
Re: Kit #304 PC-6 Porter
WOW! is that the model or the real thing? Can't tell the difference...
-
kittyfritters
- Posts: 732
- Joined: Tue Jan 03, 2006 6:58 pm
- Location: California
Re: Kit #304 PC-6 Porter
WOW! Just a little better perspective on that last shot and it would have been a real trompe l'oeil. Great build!
-
rayd
- Posts: 125
- Joined: Mon Jul 18, 2011 9:08 pm
Re: Kit #304 PC-6 Porter
Looks very good David. Have not yet even started mine. (Excuses, excuses.) A question, perhaps you or other members know. Re discontinued Guillows item, often pricey, sometimes rare on ebay and the like...the Fiesler Storch. In reading about it, my impression is that it was a smaller, earlier version STOL, in some ways, like the Porter PC-6. I'm tempted to find one. Sorry, I digress...would any of you know if Storch high winger might have been earlier version or inspiration for genuine Porter PC-6? Seems the FI-156 Storch was used by countries other than Germany eventually. Wish Guillows would remake some oldies, even if only die cut...heck, I'd settle for print wood!
-
rayd
- Posts: 125
- Joined: Mon Jul 18, 2011 9:08 pm
Re: Kit #304 PC-6 Porter
Thanks for the interesting info and tips IndoorFlyer, I'll check it out. ray
-
DenisCullinan
- Posts: 29
- Joined: Sat Oct 01, 2011 5:00 pm
- Location: Queens, NYC
Re: Kit #304 PC-6 Porter
Hello Dave---
Your planking job is nothing short of stupendous. Do you use 1/32 in. sheet for the "planks"?
Do you ease each plank into each "cell" or "window" of the framework so that it is flush with the framework members? How do you then finish the surface of the planked fuselage?
I hope my questions are clear enough!
Thanks................Denis
Your planking job is nothing short of stupendous. Do you use 1/32 in. sheet for the "planks"?
Do you ease each plank into each "cell" or "window" of the framework so that it is flush with the framework members? How do you then finish the surface of the planked fuselage?
I hope my questions are clear enough!
Thanks................Denis
-
David Lewis
- Posts: 289
- Joined: Thu Jun 13, 2013 11:47 am
- Location: Orlando FL
- Contact:
Re: Kit #304 PC-6 Porter
Phugoid wrote: "Dave, is the stringer material flimsy but light or just plain flimsy?"
This is a good question because balsa strength isn't just inversely proportional to density. Some 6 lb. balsa is surprisingly strong -- depending on growing conditions, whether the tree endured a wind storm, how straight and knot-free the grain is, and how skilfully the strip was sawed out of the log.
I use 6 lb. wood for 1/16" square stringers but it has to be strong, straight grain, clear wood in order to get away with it. I occasionally crack a stringer during normal course of building, but nothing serious. I also mic every piece of balsa with calipers, and put a sticker (noting actual thickness) on any sheets that are out of tolerance.
This is a good question because balsa strength isn't just inversely proportional to density. Some 6 lb. balsa is surprisingly strong -- depending on growing conditions, whether the tree endured a wind storm, how straight and knot-free the grain is, and how skilfully the strip was sawed out of the log.
I use 6 lb. wood for 1/16" square stringers but it has to be strong, straight grain, clear wood in order to get away with it. I occasionally crack a stringer during normal course of building, but nothing serious. I also mic every piece of balsa with calipers, and put a sticker (noting actual thickness) on any sheets that are out of tolerance.
-
Hannair
- Posts: 4
- Joined: Mon Nov 12, 2012 8:29 am
Re: Kit #304 PC-6 Porter
I'm in the process of building a Kit 304 LC PC-6 Porter. I am tempted to build a one piece wing that would sit in a "saddle" on top on the cabin. What angle should the root ribs be set to, to obtain a flying dihedral?
-
kittyfritters
- Posts: 732
- Joined: Tue Jan 03, 2006 6:58 pm
- Location: California
Re: Kit #304 PC-6 Porter
Hannair,
I have successfully flown it with as little as 3/4 inch dihedral at the tip rib. Putting 1-1/4 inch dihedral at the tip rib should be safe and easy to trim. Measure to the bottom of the tip rib, not the tip extension. The tip extensions go up to meet the top spar and provide a (very) slight amount of polydihedral.
Most people who have gone to a one piece wing hold it on with neodymium magnets. Run a 1/16" diameter tube through the fuselage at the lower strut attachment point and put 1/32" wire pins at the bottom of the struts with small neodymium magnets at the top of the struts and in the wing at the strut attachment point. That way the wing and struts come off easily for travel. Wing incidence should be 3 degrees. Check the side view on the plan.
Hope this helps!
KF
I have successfully flown it with as little as 3/4 inch dihedral at the tip rib. Putting 1-1/4 inch dihedral at the tip rib should be safe and easy to trim. Measure to the bottom of the tip rib, not the tip extension. The tip extensions go up to meet the top spar and provide a (very) slight amount of polydihedral.
Most people who have gone to a one piece wing hold it on with neodymium magnets. Run a 1/16" diameter tube through the fuselage at the lower strut attachment point and put 1/32" wire pins at the bottom of the struts with small neodymium magnets at the top of the struts and in the wing at the strut attachment point. That way the wing and struts come off easily for travel. Wing incidence should be 3 degrees. Check the side view on the plan.
Hope this helps!
KF
-
Hannair
- Posts: 4
- Joined: Mon Nov 12, 2012 8:29 am
Re: Kit #304 PC-6 Porter
Thank you, very much, for the reply "kittyfritters". This is very much appreciated. Unfortunately I made "hash' of assembling the formers of the fuselage so will be starting again. I've read your other post on assembling split formers - thought I knew how, from years ago, but will "do it" differently as I "redo" my attempt! Thanks again. Ken Hanneson. Chestermere, Alberta.