Cessna 170 (Guillow's kit #302)

Ask other modelers for a little help / knowledge ?
Post Reply
David Lewis
Posts: 289
Joined: Thu Jun 13, 2013 11:47 am
Location: Orlando FL
Contact:

Cessna 170 (Guillow's kit #302)

Post by David Lewis »

As an experiment I built two Cessna 170's. The first kit I drilled lightening holes and omitted half the wing ribs. Gross take off weight came out to 31.9 g.

The second airplane I re-cut all the parts from contest balsa. Gross weight is 13.8 g. The prop, spinner and wheels are carved balsa. Markings are brush painted enamel. Rivet and panel lines were drawn with a felt tip pen. Both airplanes have working brass-bushed balsa tailwheels, and are covered with 2 um thick aluminized mylar.

Future changes are stronger landing gear and wing attachment, better airfoil, enlarge the plans to 1:15 scale and improve scale fidelity.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Last edited by David Lewis on Tue Aug 26, 2014 5:51 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Bill Gaylord
Posts: 904
Joined: Sun Nov 09, 2008 1:29 pm
Location: Grove City PA

Re: Cessna 170 (Guillow's kit #302)

Post by Bill Gaylord »

Your experiment has very purposeful results. I came to the same conclusion that simply using lighter balsa will reduce weight far more than lightening, unless of course one blows holes through their model to the point where it looks like it was shot multiple times with a 12 gauge. This is especially true with heavy wood like we commonly see in older die-cut kits. It's easy to find wood closer to contest weight that weighs 50% or less than the heavier wood. Lightening parts 50% requires extensive surgery. I recently built a new sheeted wing for an rc Guillows P51 using contest grade formers, 1/32" sheeting, and lightweight iron-on covering. I believe it's as light as any of the previous non-sheeted wings I built for kits in the series, using stock wood.
David Lewis
Posts: 289
Joined: Thu Jun 13, 2013 11:47 am
Location: Orlando FL
Contact:

Re: Cessna 170 (Guillow's kit #302)

Post by David Lewis »

Good point. Light balsa is a powerful weight saver because strength-to-weight ratio goes up as density goes down.
Post Reply