Guillows Petition: PLEASE BRING BACK THE B-29

Ask other modelers for a little help / knowledge ?
Post Reply

BRING BACK THE B-29?

YES
15
83%
NO
3
17%
 
Total votes: 18

PsyberPhlier
Posts: 119
Joined: Mon Dec 29, 2014 8:17 am
Location: Tripp, SD USA

Guillows Petition: PLEASE BRING BACK THE B-29

Post by PsyberPhlier »

Cmon guys, lets start a movement to bring back the B-29!

It is unfortunate that Guillows stopped producing this beautiful kit just before RC equipment was small, and powerful enough to convert this big war bird. We all know that a few have been converted but to keep this alive we are forced to pay exorbitant prices on ebay for often incomplete or damaged kits, when and if they are available. There is always a chance we find another builder who has a kit socked away for a rainy day, but even that is rare anymore.

So,

CMON GUILLOWS, PLEASE BRING BACK THE B-29!

Throw your name onto the list guys, it could happen. lol.

Ted
"Chief Dumb Thumb"

Image
Brenda
Posts: 120
Joined: Wed Aug 20, 2014 1:02 pm

Re: Guillows Petition: PLEASE BRING BACK THE B-29

Post by Brenda »

Ya know, I can make a file for them to use on laser cutter. All they would have to do is plug it into machine and start cutting. Methinks there should be more laser cut everything!
Mitch
Posts: 1350
Joined: Mon Aug 22, 2011 9:16 pm
Location: Kent, WA

Re: Guillows Petition: PLEASE BRING BACK THE B-29

Post by Mitch »

Here are my thoughts... of course I would like to see the kit in production, but I would not hold your breath waiting for Guillow's to re-release the kit.

Guillow's made the decision to stop production and I believe they are the best informed to understand the market. We here are a select few. Also fewer modelers actually fly the planes. Before this comes back I would like to see the P-39 800 series, but do not expect that either.

Plastic models companies do re-release from time to time so I do believe there is hope. To simply make the kit in laser cut may not be as easy as we think. Guillow's started the process for the 500 series, 1000 series and the 2000 P-38. That was over a year ago... still no word on that.

My question to you is how many have built the B-17 while wanting the B-29? Why do we always want what we can not have? I would say enjoy what is available, support your LHS, and build the B-17... I have the B-17 and the B-25, and the Catalina... They are in my closet, that is enough for me for now.

Mitch
PsyberPhlier
Posts: 119
Joined: Mon Dec 29, 2014 8:17 am
Location: Tripp, SD USA

Re: Guillows Petition: PLEASE BRING BACK THE B-29

Post by PsyberPhlier »

Yup Mitch, I did build the B-17 as an uncovered display. I have it on the list to build again, converted to RC.

Not holding breath... lol more like begging at the very slim chance of a re-release.

Maybe, if enough of us chime in, something could happen...

Ted
"Chief Dumb Thumb"

Image
gordonfan24
Posts: 37
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2015 4:42 pm

Re: Guillows Petition: PLEASE BRING BACK THE B-29

Post by gordonfan24 »

I'd buy 3 at the very least.
"If you enjoy what you do for a living, you'll never work a day in your life."
PsyberPhlier
Posts: 119
Joined: Mon Dec 29, 2014 8:17 am
Location: Tripp, SD USA

Re: Guillows Petition: PLEASE BRING BACK THE B-29

Post by PsyberPhlier »

Heck, I am also good for at least 2. One to replace the one I will undoubtedly auger in... lol

Ted
"Chief Dumb Thumb"

Image
twospruces
Posts: 96
Joined: Tue Nov 20, 2012 9:27 pm

Re: Guillows Petition: PLEASE BRING BACK THE B-29

Post by twospruces »

I would think that Guillows could offer these shorter run models via mail order only. These days, they don't need a distributor channel quite so much. A boutique outlet managed directly by them might be a reasonable way to make some dollars and satisfy that smaller niche (but higher priced). I'd argue that people would pay a premium to obtain these models that have been discontinued.

But I'm also sure that has been considered by the pros in the office!
Bill Gaylord
Posts: 904
Joined: Sun Nov 09, 2008 1:29 pm
Location: Grove City PA

Re: Guillows Petition: PLEASE BRING BACK THE B-29

Post by Bill Gaylord »

They would sell enough to make it worth their while, especially considering that they have all the tooling. The point of them discontinuing the kit right before electric/lipo caught on is valid. With the practicality of r/c conversion, they would sell a reasonable number. There really isn't much in the size range, and $125 would be well within a reasonable price range, where they should be able to turn a profit. I also could see the Aircobra offered in the 400 series as profitable. The same holds true for it, in that there is no current competition in the size range.
David Lewis
Posts: 289
Joined: Thu Jun 13, 2013 11:47 am
Location: Orlando FL
Contact:

Re: Guillows Petition: PLEASE BRING BACK THE B-29

Post by David Lewis »

One of the stumbling blocks with the B-29 and P-39, etc. could be that the younger generations now tend to be less familiar with, or less interested in, these aircraft than model enthusiasts were in the old days.
BillParker
Posts: 1031
Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2008 1:21 pm
Location: Houston, Texas
Contact:

Re: Guillows Petition: PLEASE BRING BACK THE B-29

Post by BillParker »

Every couple of years we have this conversation. It is an important conversation, so please don't misunderstand my point...

Some years back Howard (aka Kittyfritters) shared an insider's look at the economics of kit manufacturing (specifically Guillow's) that was quite enlightening.

Howard, could you copy and paste that bit here for us? I've search everyway I can think of, but no joy...

Thanx!


bp
William H. Parker Jr. (Bill Parker)
President, Parker Information Resources
http://www.parkerinfo.com/ap.htm bparker@parkerinfo.com
Mitch
Posts: 1350
Joined: Mon Aug 22, 2011 9:16 pm
Location: Kent, WA

Re: Guillows Petition: PLEASE BRING BACK THE B-29

Post by Mitch »

Hi Fellow builders<

As far as the P-39 goes... I was confused why it is by itself in the 800 series. I had the kit for many years in my closet... I opened it up last year. Although it say 1/12 scale on the box cover that is incorrect. It is 1/16 scale just like the 400 and 1000 series. The plans say 1/16 scale... I did the math, it is 1/16 scale. The ws is right in line with the 400 series models. The detail of the kit is right in line with the 1000 series. They are all 1/16 scale. I believe Guillow figured since the ws is what it is, it would not be comparable in the 1000 series. Therefore they put it in the 800 series, super detailed kits. If anyone sees one on ebay at a reasonable price I would say buy it. It is one of the nicest kits Guillow's ever made! It has decals for American and Russian markings.

Mitch
Brenda
Posts: 120
Joined: Wed Aug 20, 2014 1:02 pm

Re: Guillows Petition: PLEASE BRING BACK THE B-29

Post by Brenda »

I like my Bell P-39. Mine has Cox TeeDee on it for ukie

Image

Image
BillParker
Posts: 1031
Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2008 1:21 pm
Location: Houston, Texas
Contact:

Re: Guillows Petition: PLEASE BRING BACK THE B-29

Post by BillParker »

I wasn't lucky enuff to get one the kits, but I did get my hands on the plan...

Image

80"


bp
William H. Parker Jr. (Bill Parker)
President, Parker Information Resources
http://www.parkerinfo.com/ap.htm bparker@parkerinfo.com
SteveM
Posts: 498
Joined: Wed Oct 24, 2007 1:06 pm
Location: Beaverton, OR
Contact:

Re: Guillows Petition: PLEASE BRING BACK THE B-29

Post by SteveM »

Here are a few threads that may help shed some light on the issue.

http://www.balsamodels.com/phpBB/viewto ... f=2&t=1537
http://www.balsamodels.com/phpBB/viewto ... f=2&t=1479
http://www.balsamodels.com/phpBB/viewto ... f=2&t=1347

Personally I find the B-29 ugly and the B-17 far better looking and with a richer war service record.
BillParker
Posts: 1031
Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2008 1:21 pm
Location: Houston, Texas
Contact:

Re: Guillows Petition: PLEASE BRING BACK THE B-29

Post by BillParker »

Well done, Steve, thank you...


bp
William H. Parker Jr. (Bill Parker)
President, Parker Information Resources
http://www.parkerinfo.com/ap.htm bparker@parkerinfo.com
Post Reply