I was inspired to bash the Arrow kit 702 when I ran across these plans for Twinster on Outerzone. I chopped 2" off the tail and will go from 28" to 30" wing span. The booms will be on a 9" centerline and I have some counter rotating 6.5" props off a long forgotten Wright flyer.
Question: Should I build the stabilizer flat or use the ribs and make it lift?
702 Kit Bash / Twin Arrow
-
sandman
- Posts: 16
- Joined: Thu Jul 30, 2015 6:47 am
- Location: Sioux City, Iowa
702 Kit Bash / Twin Arrow
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
-
Bill Gaylord
- Posts: 904
- Joined: Sun Nov 09, 2008 1:29 pm
- Location: Grove City PA
Re: 702 Kit Bash / Twin Arrow
Neat subject. The undercambered horizontal stabilizer section is probably intended as a "lifting stab", allowing for a further aft CG. My guess is the designer is trying to avoid adding excessive nose ballast, along with other possible reasons for the design.
-
davidchoate
- Posts: 1263
- Joined: Wed Aug 14, 2013 6:41 am
- Location: PHiladelphia PA
- Contact:
Re: 702 Kit Bash / Twin Arrow
I was recently asking a similar question, but mine was "does an aifoil tail get added as wing area". Then I found out that certain competition rules have limits on wing area, and also I made aware of how it can be used to "lighten the tail" So to speak. I don't know Sandman. Definitely something to consider. It is a mighty big Stabilizer. I think I would stick with the airfoil lifting tail. I was not pleased with My Arrows. I built several trying different tweaks on each one, and I can not say It did not Fly good, but considering it is not a scale model, and purposely designed for long Rubber FF, It did not Fly any longer than the Scale FF planes I have made. I think it has a too short Wing Chord, and I am no expert in FF what soever, but I did 1 with the undercamber wing, and it was an improvement. The Guillows in a bag. That one We used to buy as kids with the solid balsa wong on a stick is a good example. Those things Fly better than any Kit They have, and its got that under camber Wing. I do not know the physics of it, but airfoils are going to become an area of flight I am ready to start learning about.
-
sandman
- Posts: 16
- Joined: Thu Jul 30, 2015 6:47 am
- Location: Sioux City, Iowa
Re: 702 Kit Bash / Twin Arrow
Thanks for the suggestions gentlemen. Both plans have a lifting stabilizer and although it would be easier to start with a flat I think I will go with the original design intent and make the stabilizer lift. I made some blueprints at work for the modified wing and stabilizer. The two fuselages are almost done except for the prop stops and landing gear which I will be adding after I set the wing and stab. The fuselages weigh 6.5 grams each. This plane will be FF and I plan on sliding pins into coffee straws glued to the nose to hold the props till im ready to launch ROG. More next week!
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
-
David Lewis
- Posts: 289
- Joined: Thu Jun 13, 2013 11:47 am
- Location: Orlando FL
- Contact:
Re: 702 Kit Bash / Twin Arrow
A lifting stabilizer means the CG is pretty far back and there's no decalage (zero-zero setup). You can use either a flat plate or flat bottom stabilizer airfoil. The stabilizer angle of attack is low enough that I don't think you'll see much difference in performance.
-
sandman
- Posts: 16
- Joined: Thu Jul 30, 2015 6:47 am
- Location: Sioux City, Iowa
Re: 702 Kit Bash / Twin Arrow
Thanks for the info Mr. Lewis but im a little worried now. I have my lifting stabilizer done but it wont be adjustable and I built in some negative incidence of a degree or two based on past experience. I also shortened the fuselage by two inches and with those beefy twin props up front I might be nose heavy. Hopefully I can come in at under 60 grams and this thing will be a real floater. I like the way my prop stops turned out and hope they work as good as they look.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.