Thanks, Walt
PT17 Static Version
-
waltcorr
- Posts: 12
- Joined: Tue Jul 24, 2012 11:34 am
PT17 Static Version
Since I am much too old to try flying models, I am starting to build the PT17, which was the primary trainer in the course of getting my wings (WW11). If anyone has building pictures or suggestions I would appreciate seeing or reading them.
Thanks, Walt
Thanks, Walt
-
joecrouse
- Posts: 216
- Joined: Mon May 23, 2011 9:20 am
Re: PT17 Static Version
Who told you that you are too old to build flying models?
-
BillParker
- Posts: 1031
- Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2008 1:21 pm
- Location: Houston, Texas
- Contact:
Re: PT17 Static Version

William H. Parker Jr. (Bill Parker)
President, Parker Information Resources
http://www.parkerinfo.com/ap.htm bparker@parkerinfo.com
President, Parker Information Resources
http://www.parkerinfo.com/ap.htm bparker@parkerinfo.com
-
cliffm
- Posts: 370
- Joined: Fri Feb 27, 2009 11:08 am
- Location: fairdale N D
Re: PT17 Static Version
I'll see if I can get a build pic for yo
u
u-
waltcorr
- Posts: 12
- Joined: Tue Jul 24, 2012 11:34 am
Re: PT17 Static Version
Hi Joe,joecrouse wrote:Who told you that you are too old to build flying models?
I don't think I'm too old to build flying models, I just can't fly them anymore. In 2 months I am 91 yrs old and love building models. As a retired military pilot, I obviously lean towards aircraft but I have built numerous sailing ships as well as some auto's.
Thanks for responding Joe, I appreciate it.
-
waltcorr
- Posts: 12
- Joined: Tue Jul 24, 2012 11:34 am
Re: PT17 Static Version
Hi Dave,David Duckett wrote:http://www.virtualaerodrome.com/image_browser.html?p_aircraft_id=41&p_user_id=156
Thanks for the pictures, I admire you workmanship and trust that I can come close. I will certainly use your pictures as a guide to show me how it"s done.
Thanks for the response, I do appreciate it
waltcorr
-
waltcorr
- Posts: 12
- Joined: Tue Jul 24, 2012 11:34 am
Re: PT17 Static Version
Hi Bill,BillParker wrote:
Thanks for your response. I am truly envious of the fine models you guys build. I might have done it years ago but since I am nearly 91, my skills have deminished somewhat. I still love building models and with the help of my forum friends I'll carry on.
waltcorr
-
waltcorr
- Posts: 12
- Joined: Tue Jul 24, 2012 11:34 am
Re: PT17 Static Version
Hi Cliff,cliffm wrote:I'll see if I can get a build pic for you
Thanks for your response, I appreciate any help at all. Since I am about to be 91 yrs old I feel that the help I get from Forum friends will be of great service to me.
Thanks again, waltcorr
-
Wildpig
- Posts: 529
- Joined: Thu Jan 26, 2012 9:41 am
Re: PT17 Static Version
Hey Walt,
You mentioned you were a military pilot and you got your initial training in a PT17. Nice. I've flown a PT17. Lots of fun.
What other aircraft did you fly?
You mentioned you were a military pilot and you got your initial training in a PT17. Nice. I've flown a PT17. Lots of fun.
What other aircraft did you fly?
-
waltcorr
- Posts: 12
- Joined: Tue Jul 24, 2012 11:34 am
Re: PT17 Static Version
At basic, I flew the BT13, at advanced, AT6 and twin engine trainers. I graduated in class 42J and was assigned to Military Air Transport (MATS). From there I flew a DC3(C47) to India and flew the Hump to China.Later I transferred to china and flew C46.C87.Wildpig wrote:Hey Walt,
You mentioned you were a military pilot and you got your initial training in a PT17. Nice. I've flown a PT17. Lots of fun.
What other aircraft did you fly?
Thanks for asking, Walt
-
BillParker
- Posts: 1031
- Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2008 1:21 pm
- Location: Houston, Texas
- Contact:
Re: PT17 Static Version
The C46? KEWL!

Ooooops! That ain't Guillow's... Sorry guys!

Ooooops! That ain't Guillow's... Sorry guys!
William H. Parker Jr. (Bill Parker)
President, Parker Information Resources
http://www.parkerinfo.com/ap.htm bparker@parkerinfo.com
President, Parker Information Resources
http://www.parkerinfo.com/ap.htm bparker@parkerinfo.com
-
waltcorr
- Posts: 12
- Joined: Tue Jul 24, 2012 11:34 am
Re: PT17 Static Version
Hey Bill, That's the first model of a C46 I have ever seen and it looks great.As I mentioned we got C46's at Kunming China because the field elevation was so high that it was tricky taking off facing the mtn"s in C47"s. The 46 gave us more power and a little more peace when the weather was bad. By the way, I picked up a war weary 46 in India and flew it all the way back to Miami, Fla.BillParker wrote:The C46? KEWL!
Ooooops! That ain't Guillow's... Sorry guys!
Thanks for the picture, it brought back a lot of memories.