PT17 Static Version

Ask other modelers for a little help / knowledge ?
Post Reply
waltcorr
Posts: 12
Joined: Tue Jul 24, 2012 11:34 am

PT17 Static Version

Post by waltcorr »

Since I am much too old to try flying models, I am starting to build the PT17, which was the primary trainer in the course of getting my wings (WW11). If anyone has building pictures or suggestions I would appreciate seeing or reading them. :D :D

Thanks, Walt
joecrouse
Posts: 216
Joined: Mon May 23, 2011 9:20 am

Re: PT17 Static Version

Post by joecrouse »

Who told you that you are too old to build flying models?
BillParker
Posts: 1031
Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2008 1:21 pm
Location: Houston, Texas
Contact:

Re: PT17 Static Version

Post by BillParker »

Image
William H. Parker Jr. (Bill Parker)
President, Parker Information Resources
http://www.parkerinfo.com/ap.htm bparker@parkerinfo.com
cliffm
Posts: 370
Joined: Fri Feb 27, 2009 11:08 am
Location: fairdale N D

Re: PT17 Static Version

Post by cliffm »

I'll see if I can get a build pic for yoImageu
waltcorr
Posts: 12
Joined: Tue Jul 24, 2012 11:34 am

Re: PT17 Static Version

Post by waltcorr »

joecrouse wrote:Who told you that you are too old to build flying models?
Hi Joe,
I don't think I'm too old to build flying models, I just can't fly them anymore. In 2 months I am 91 yrs old and love building models. As a retired military pilot, I obviously lean towards aircraft but I have built numerous sailing ships as well as some auto's.
Thanks for responding Joe, I appreciate it.
waltcorr
Posts: 12
Joined: Tue Jul 24, 2012 11:34 am

Re: PT17 Static Version

Post by waltcorr »

David Duckett wrote:http://www.virtualaerodrome.com/image_browser.html?p_aircraft_id=41&p_user_id=156
Hi Dave,
Thanks for the pictures, I admire you workmanship and trust that I can come close. I will certainly use your pictures as a guide to show me how it"s done.
Thanks for the response, I do appreciate it

waltcorr
waltcorr
Posts: 12
Joined: Tue Jul 24, 2012 11:34 am

Re: PT17 Static Version

Post by waltcorr »

BillParker wrote:Image
Hi Bill,

Thanks for your response. I am truly envious of the fine models you guys build. I might have done it years ago but since I am nearly 91, my skills have deminished somewhat. I still love building models and with the help of my forum friends I'll carry on.

waltcorr
waltcorr
Posts: 12
Joined: Tue Jul 24, 2012 11:34 am

Re: PT17 Static Version

Post by waltcorr »

cliffm wrote:I'll see if I can get a build pic for yoImageu
Hi Cliff,

Thanks for your response, I appreciate any help at all. Since I am about to be 91 yrs old I feel that the help I get from Forum friends will be of great service to me.

Thanks again, waltcorr
Wildpig
Posts: 529
Joined: Thu Jan 26, 2012 9:41 am

Re: PT17 Static Version

Post by Wildpig »

Hey Walt,
You mentioned you were a military pilot and you got your initial training in a PT17. Nice. I've flown a PT17. Lots of fun.
What other aircraft did you fly?
waltcorr
Posts: 12
Joined: Tue Jul 24, 2012 11:34 am

Re: PT17 Static Version

Post by waltcorr »

Wildpig wrote:Hey Walt,
You mentioned you were a military pilot and you got your initial training in a PT17. Nice. I've flown a PT17. Lots of fun.
What other aircraft did you fly?
At basic, I flew the BT13, at advanced, AT6 and twin engine trainers. I graduated in class 42J and was assigned to Military Air Transport (MATS). From there I flew a DC3(C47) to India and flew the Hump to China.Later I transferred to china and flew C46.C87.
Thanks for asking, Walt
BillParker
Posts: 1031
Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2008 1:21 pm
Location: Houston, Texas
Contact:

Re: PT17 Static Version

Post by BillParker »

The C46? KEWL!

Image

Ooooops! That ain't Guillow's... Sorry guys!
William H. Parker Jr. (Bill Parker)
President, Parker Information Resources
http://www.parkerinfo.com/ap.htm bparker@parkerinfo.com
waltcorr
Posts: 12
Joined: Tue Jul 24, 2012 11:34 am

Re: PT17 Static Version

Post by waltcorr »

BillParker wrote:The C46? KEWL!

Image

Ooooops! That ain't Guillow's... Sorry guys!
Hey Bill, That's the first model of a C46 I have ever seen and it looks great.As I mentioned we got C46's at Kunming China because the field elevation was so high that it was tricky taking off facing the mtn"s in C47"s. The 46 gave us more power and a little more peace when the weather was bad. By the way, I picked up a war weary 46 in India and flew it all the way back to Miami, Fla.

Thanks for the picture, it brought back a lot of memories.
Post Reply